Congress
through the Motor Carrier Safety Improvement Act of 1999, and the Federal Motor
Carrier Safety Administration through their fatality reduction plan has set the
nation up for dismal failure in commercial motor vehicle (CMV) safety
improvement.
Although well intended and politically popular, the approach and resultant
regulations will do nothing other than degrade commercial vehicle safety. How
can this be?
The premise of the regulations is to reduce fatalities suffered in crashes
involving commercial motor vehicles. This would sound to be a noble cause except
for two fatal flaws:
- The legislators and regulators somehow feel they have control over the
outcome of crashes involving commercial motor vehicles. I actually heard a
FMCSA official state that "they weren't going to focus on all CMV
crashes, only the fatal ones". As any safety professional worth his or
her salt can tell you, "you can control frequency (numbers of
occurrences) but you can't control the severity (outcome) of vehicle
crashes". Whether a crash results in a fatality (ies) or everyone
walking away without a scratch is a function of literally thousands of
circumstances that come together in a split second. No one has control over
these circumstances nor the resultant outcomes.
- By most reliable data available, 70% to 80% of all crashes involving
commercial motor vehicles were directly caused by an automobile driver
involved in the crash. A recent analytical study put this number at 71%.
Although this premise is disputed by politically powerful, psuedo-safety
groups such as CRASH & PATT the data is solid and irrefutable. By
forcing the focus of fatality reduction on to the commercial vehicle
operators through regulation the regulators have taken the focus off the
main commercial motor vehicle crash causal factor......the General
Motoring Public.
In order to make sustainable reductions in CMV crash fatalities, we must
focus on reduction of all CMV crashes not just the ones involving fatalities.
And we must involve the most significant causal factor in the reduction plan...the
General Motoring Public.
Although FMCSA does have a public outreach program in the No Zone program,
it is too little and it is much too late. We will never be able to improve
commercial motor vehicle safety by focusing 80% of our resources on 20% of the
problem.
The bubble of good news on commercial vehicle fatality reduction in 1999 will
inevitably burst and the legislators and regulators will once again scramble to
draft regulations for the commercial vehicle operators in an attempt to reduce
fatalities.
Until we as a nation get our heads out of the sand and carefully,
scientifically and purposely develop a strategy to reduce commercial vehicle
fatalities........... we will continue to be doomed to failure.
When we finally decide that we want to quit pointing fingers, effectively
reduce commercial motor vehicle crash fatalities, properly determine the major
causal factors and take positive steps towards a common reduction
goal...............we will be successful.
Commentary
is by Dennis W Greany, CSP. Dennis is Senior Safety Consultant for SafeTrac
Solutions, Inc, is a member of the Board of Certified Safety Professionals, a
professional member of the American Society of Safety Engineers and has over 26
years experience in the trucking, construction and mining industries.
If you have comments or opposing points of view, please let us
hear them by clicking here.